Home  ›  Perfect Grammar

Perfect Grammar

The perfective aspect Schematic traditional aspects of these

You can find this pattern in many modern grammars .

is the terminus a quo for trial, and the terminus ad quem of that trial.

Any trial can be represented as: ----------

Perfective in a trial, the trial ---------- is realized when is reached.

In a trial imperfective, on the contrary, the trial ---------- is performed as soon as is reached (once the action has begun).

Effect of context on semantic aspects

The aspectual opposition perfective / imperfective opposition is semantic in French. It is not based in fact on the meaning of the verb and has no connection with the combination or any systematic affixation (as is the case in Slavic languages) in French, a verb is perfective perfective regardless is the time at which it is conjugated.

In contrast, the syntactic construction tense or context, insofar as they alter the meaning of the verb, modify its appearance. Thus it is clear that die and die of envy, even if it is the same verb, do not have the same meaning and, in this case, dying is perfective, but craving is imperfective. It is said that in craving, the verb to die is Perfect Imperfection.

In some cases, perfectivation (or imperfectivation) may be based on a contextual difference, insofar as this difference changes the contextual meaning of the verb. For example, the child falls, the verb has perfective aspect, while the rain falls, it has an imperfective aspect . These changes are very numerous.

The aspect perfective / imperfective in Slavic languages

In Slavic languages, the aspectual opposition is very important but it is a grammatical opposition and not semantics.

Polish and Russian, for example, a perfective verb has no present, in contrast, the future of a verb imperfective passes through a compound time (old periphrasis be built on the auxiliary).

Distribution in Russian aspectual Distribution in Polish aspectual
Imperfective Perfective Mode or
Time
Imperfective Perfective

do

do
infinitive aerobics
do
z aerobics
do

I was

I made
past robiem
I was
z robiem
I made

I
- This robie
I
-

I will

I will
future bede Robic, comics Robilant
I will
zrobi
I will


Distribution of drawers verbal aspectual verb eat in Serbian:
Imperfective Perfective Time
Sat jeo ja Ja Sat pojeo past
Sat bio ja jeo Sat ja bio pojeo Pluperfect
Ja Cu Majesty Ja Cu pojesti future

The terms perfective and imperfective may have different meanings. The traditional meaning was this: the perfective is the action in its entirety, as a point, without any future; the imperfective watch in the making, and the time line ( Saussure , Ling. gen., 1916, p. 162). These two definitions correspond to those of today's overall appearance (or non-intersecting) and appearance secant , but confusion can still exist.

Moreover, to speak Slavic perfektum often employed the term perfective. This aspect is so important that in Slavic can speak French without even knowing aspects of French, translating logical perfektum by perfective (false friend). But the notion of perfektum in Slavic covers two notions in French, on the one hand the completed (which is a grammatical aspect ) and secondly the perfective (which in French is a semantic aspect , which is not quite perfektum in Slavic). Number of works in French also still give the word as a synonym perfective done by (two different concepts in French). Finally the English terms perfect tense perfective tense and are also false friends.

Related articles

Notes

  1. Sources of the following definition of these aspects, except for tests and examples: Martin Riegel, Jean-Christophe Pellat, Rene Rioul, methodical French Grammar, 5th ed. Update, Presses Universitaires de France, coll. "Linguistics news," Paris, 1999, 23 cm, XXIII-646 p. ( ISBN 2-13-050249-0 ) And Mark Wilmoth , critical of French Grammar, 3rd ed. Duculot, Brussels, 2003, 23 cm, 758 p. ( ISBN 2-8011-1337-9 ) .
  2. Soutet Olivier , The syntax of French, PUF , 1989, ISBN 1 045687 13 February
  3. Grammar of French, Wagner and Pinchon, ISBN 2 01 001325 5.
  4. Wilmet Studies, morpho-syntax verbal, Paris, 1976.
  5. For example, in the Larousse Encyclopedia 2006 on CD-ROM.

Leave a Reply

1 vote, average: 4.00 out of 51 vote, average: 4.00 out of 51 vote, average: 4.00 out of 51 vote, average: 4.00 out of 51 vote, average: 4.00 out of 5 (1 votes, average: 4.00 out of 5, rated)
Loading ... Loading ...
Help us improve the wiki Send Your Comments